Two Trucks and Recourse Factoring

By Anthony Eden, Co-founder & CEO

So nine freight and transportation companies filed for bankruptcy in the last two weeks. One of them was two trucks and two drivers.

Now let's play a game, where they were using a factor to advance their invoices. When a client like that goes under, the factor isn't looking to chargeback or enforce recourse in a situation this bleak. The question becomes, does the debtor still pay the outstanding invoices to a client that's gone bust?

What protects the lender is the paperwork done on every invoice. If it was a true sale and you served a notice of assignment the debtor provably received, under UCC 9-406, they must pay you - the bankrupt client's Chapter 7 doesn't come into it.

UCC 9-404 however, is where things get quirky - it allows a debtor to make a claim from the underlying contract that predates the notice. Their argument becomes "that work was for a company that's now bankrupt; prove the amount and that it was delivered." Without a verification trail - POD/ rate con/ signed BOL, etc, - 9-406 hands you a legal right you as a lender can't actually collect on, especially once Chapter 7 makes verifying after the fact impossible.

And recourse won't save you. As bankruptcies hit bigger and bigger carriers, recourse just charges the invoice back to a client who no longer exists. In a client failure, it's an audit trail that saves you.

Which is why the next move belongs to the capital layer. A factor's verification rigor is becoming a credit input on the factor itself - the shops running 5-8% loss ratios out of spreadsheets are the ones warehouse lenders now hesitate to fund.

So, for the factors and lenders: when a client files Chapter 7, does your team scramble to reconstruct proof on every open invoice - or is it sitting there, ready to go? And are your warehouse lenders starting to ask about verification and loss rates (outside of recourse) when they set your terms?

A slightly cleaner wind-down than Chapter 7 is the new UABCA. Delaware just became the sixth state to adopt it, and it allows factors to keep collecting in an orderly wind-down. Useful one to keep in mind when dealing with any clients en route to a shutdown.

Originally published on LinkedIn, .

More from the blog

See what Iridium can do for your team.

Book a demo
Preview of the Iridium dashboard interface, showing portfolio value, active invoices, and required-attention items